Bidding stays aggressive in solar auctions

24 May 2018 |

NTPC, SECI and Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) completed auctions for their 750 MW, 200 MW and 1,000 MW tenders respectively in last two weeks. The NTPC and SECI projects would be located in Anantapur solar park, Andhra Pradesh and Pavagada solar park, Karnataka respectively. There is no solar park availability for the MSEDCL tender.

Capacity has been won by following developers:

– NTPC tender: Sprng (250 MW, INR 2.72), Ayana Renewables (250 MW, INR 2.73) and SoftBank (250 MW, INR 2.73);

– SECI tender: SoftBank (200 MW, INR 2.82);

– MSEDCL tender: Technique solar (20 MW, INR 2.71), Adani (200 MW, INR 2.71), ReNew and ACME (250 MW each, INR 2.72), Tata (150 MW, INR 2.71) and Azure (130 MW, INR 2.72);

The difference between profiles of winning bidders in the three tenders is pretty stark. Successful winners in the NTPC and SECI tenders are large international developers, who tend to be more risk averse particularly on offtake and land acquisition aspects. In contrast, winners in the MSEDCL auction are predominantly Indian developers.

After factoring in solar park costs (NPV of INR 9.8 million and 8.8 million/ MW for Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka solar parks respectively), bids under NTPC and SECI tenders are extremely aggressive as per our calculations. It is clear that the international bidders are paying a substantial premium for their risk aversion.

MSEDCL is one of the healthier DISCOMs (A rated) in the country but its record on renewable energy has been mixed with multiple incidents of payment delays and PPA execution delays. Despite that, the tender was oversubscribed by 45% and the winning tariffs are also fairly aggressive in our view. It is notable that the Maharashtra tender had to be re-issued for the fifth time. It failed to attract sufficient interest previously due to missing change in law protection from safeguard/ anti-dumping duty risk. But after the clause was added, the tender saw strong bidder interest.

By our calculations, risk-adjusted equity IRR for all these tenders is barely in double digits, way below the return hurdle for the sector. More than 10 GW of tenders are pending allocation but 7 GW of this capacity is stuck due to intra-state transmission system connectivity concerns. Developers, keen to add to their business pipeline now, appear willing to accept growing execution challenges and ignore soaring tender promises of MNRE.


Recent reports

A business case for renewable energy certificates for Indian companies to meet RE 100 targets

C&I consumers account for 53% of power consumption but only 6% of this requirement is met from direct procurement of renewable power. In face of m...

Download

A business case for rationalisation of Green Tariffs in India

Only about 6% of total C&I demand is met from direct procurement of renewable power. In face of multiple challenges faced by established routes li...

Download

India Corporate Renewable Brief | Q3 2022   

Our latest edition of quarterly report provides a detailed regular update on key trends and developments in the C&I renewable market....

Buy Report Download Executive Summary

India PV Module Intelligence Brief | Q3 2022   

This report captures quarterly trends in module demand and supply, import and domestic production volumes, supplier market shares, break-up by technol...

Buy Report

India Solar Compass | Q3 2022   

This report provides a detailed update of all key sector developments and trends in the quarter – capacity addition, leading players, tenders and po...

Buy Report Download Executive Summary
Award winnig research
We use cookies to offer you an optimal user experience and collect information on website usage.